PICKEM POKER RTP
Pickem Poker RTP and House Edge
Pickem Poker RTP depends on the exact historical two-stack paytable and on the quality of the stack choices you make. This page explains the full-pay reference, reduced tables, expected loss, variance, and why published sources disagree on some schedules.
Last reviewed:
Quick answer
The commonly cited full-pay Pickem Poker table returns 99.9531% with expert play, leaving a house edge of 0.0469%. That figure applies only to the specific five-credit reference schedule, not to every Pickem Poker, Pick Em Poker, or Pick a Pair implementation in an online casino lobby. Always verify the active paytable before real-money play.
RTP and house edge formula
House edge = 100% - RTP
100% - 99.9531% = 0.0469%
RTP is a long-run mathematical expectation. It does not predict what one session will do, and it does not mean a player will receive the same percentage back over a small number of hands. In video poker, the measured return comes from a combination of paytable, game rules, and decisions.
Full-pay reference return
The full-pay reference used on this site is the five-credit 6000-1199-600-90-75-55-25-15-10 schedule. In that published analysis, the return is 99.9531% and the house edge is 0.0469% under correct strategy. The max-coin Royal Flush is 6,000 credits, the Straight Flush is 1,199, and the game pays from Pair of Nines or Better.
Where the return comes from
The largest share of return comes from common hands, not only from the Royal Flush. In the full-pay reference, Pair of Nines or Better contributes about 45.6750 percentage points of return, Two Pair about 18.6263, and Three of a Kind about 15.0073. Together, those three common categories contribute about 79.3086 percentage points. The Royal Flush contributes about 0.3411 percentage points even though it creates the largest single payout.
Paytable comparison and expected loss
Expected loss is a theoretical long-run average, not a session forecast. At a 0.0469% house edge, 1,000 credits of total action has an expected loss of 0.469 credits, 10,000 credits of total action has an expected loss of 4.69 credits, and 100,000 credits of total action has an expected loss of 46.9 credits. At five credits per hand, 10,000 credits of total action equals 2,000 hands.
| Configuration | Displayed sequence | Reported RTP | House edge | Expected loss per 10,000 credits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical full-pay reference | 6000-1199-600-90-75-55-25-15-10 | 99.9531% | 0.0469% | 4.69 credits |
| Wizard higher-Royal, lower-Straight table | 10000-1199-600-90-75-50-25-15-10 | 99.6885% | 0.3115% | 31.15 credits |
| Wizard 6,000-Royal, lower-Straight table | 6000-1199-600-90-75-50-25-15-10 | 99.4466% | 0.5534% | 55.34 credits |
| Lower Full House and lower Straight table | 6000-1199-600-75-75-50-25-15-10 | 98.7397% | 1.2603% | 126.03 credits |
Why sources can look inconsistent
Beating Bonuses labels a 6,000-Royal and 50-Straight schedule at approximately 99.69%, while Wizard of Odds publishes 99.4466% for the visible 6000-1199-600-90-75-50-25-15-10 sequence and 99.6885% for the 10000-1199-600-90-75-50-25-15-10 sequence. The safest way to use these references is to match the exact displayed paytable and avoid treating one rounded figure as universal.
Strategy error cost
A single close choice can matter. If one stack choice has an expected value of 5.7092 credits and the other has 5.4734 credits, the difference is 0.2358 credits. Repeating that mistake 100 times would cost about 23.58 credits in theoretical value. Actual short-term results can still swing above or below that because the final hands are variable.
Hit frequency and variance
Published full-pay analysis reports an overall hit frequency around 33.1541%, or roughly one paying hand every 3.016 hands. The Pickem Poker odds guide covers the hand-frequency side in more detail. That does not make the game smooth. The standard deviation is about 3.8737 wager units, which is roughly 19.37 credits at a five-credit wager. Even a strong table can produce losing stretches.
Realized return versus theoretical RTP
Realized return is what happened in your own sample. Theoretical RTP is what the paytable and strategy imply over a very large number of hands. A player can run above 100% for a while, below the published return for a long while, or miss rare hands entirely in a short sample.
Bonus and casino caution
RTP is not the same as bonus value. A casino bonus can exclude video poker, reduce video poker contribution, cap winnings, or require play on other games. Before depositing at LasVegasUSA or any other listed casino, confirm the exact two-stack Pickem Poker or Pick a Pair implementation, the active paytable, regional eligibility, banking terms, and bonus rules inside the current casino lobby.
Sources and Methodology
Published reference: historical RTP, house-edge, variance, and reduced-schedule figures were checked against Wizard of Odds Pick ’em Poker return tables, Beating Bonuses Pickem Poker reference and calculator context, and Henry Tamburin’s Pick ’Em Poker explanation where the historical five-credit table and Royal frequency are discussed.
PickemPoker.com calculation: expected-loss examples and interpretation of source disagreement were independently recalculated from the visible percentages and paytable sequences.
Live status: historical math does not prove that a current casino offers the game or the same paytable. Use the sources as research aids, then verify the game you are actually playing.